Quantifying student satisfaction with technology-enhanced textbooks in the Japanese university context

Daniel James Mills, Daniel Olsson

Abstract


Thirty-three students used their personal mobile devices to access digital media in a paper-based textbook containing Quick Response (QR) codes. The students worked in small groups with minimal intervention from the course instructor to participate in activities and complete assignments. Information regarding student satisfaction with the course, as well as their perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of the instructional method employed, were gathered through a questionnaire and a reflective writing activity. The results indicated that overall satisfaction was high (M = 3.38), especially regarding the role of the instructor (M = 3.35) and interaction (M = 3.35). However, participants indicated a lower level of satisfaction with the materials (M = 2.89). Further inquiry revealed that dissatisfaction with the course materials was due to the lack of a stable Wi-Fi connection at the university rather than the design or content of the textbooks.

Keywords


autonomy, quick response codes, satisfaction, student-centered, technology-enhanced materials

Full Text:

PDF

References


Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routedge.

Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2012). Student perceptions of satisfaction and anxiety in an online doctoral program. Distance Education, 33(1), 81-98.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Boring, A. (2017). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics, 145, 27-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.006

Chen, W. S. & Yao, A. Y. T. (2016). An empirical evaluation of critical factors influencing learner satisfaction in blended learning: A pilot study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7). 1667-1671.

Dafei, D. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), 1-23.

Farahmandian, S., Minavand, H. & Afshardost, M., 2013. Perceived service quality and student satisfaction in higher education. Journal of Business and Management, 12(4). 65-74.

Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044

Gudykunst, W., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with strangers (4th ed.). New York, NY:

McGraw-Hill.

Ike, M. (1995). A historical review of English in Japan (1600–1880). World Englishes, 14(1), 3-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-971X.1995.tb00335.x

Jiang, Y. (2014). Review: Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(6), 731-733.

Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Shin, E. K. (2017). Students’ expectation, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use digital textbooks. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 83–90. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.025

Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status (pp. 386-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kember, D. & Ginns, P. (2012). Evaluating teaching and learning. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.

Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for teachers and learners. Chicago, IL: Follett.

Koseke, G. F. & Koseke, R. D. (1991). Student burnout as a mediator of the stress-outcome relationship. Research in Higher Education, 32(4), 415-431.

Lai, C. (2013). Autonomous language learning with technology: Beyond the classroom.. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.

Leung, A. (2004). Fostering learner autonomy among weak students via information technology. The HKU Scholars Hub. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10722/30657

Littrell, R. (2006). Learning styles of students in and from Confucian cultures, 1-38. Retrieved

from http://romielittrellpubs.homestead.com/files/littrell_eu_asean_crosscultural

learningstyles.pdf

Mills, D. J. (2016). Acceptance and usage of mobile devices for informal English language learning in the Japanese university context. University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.

Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359-374. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044

Navarro, M. M., Iglesias, M. P. & Torres, P. R., 2005. A new management element for universities: Satisfaction with the offered courses. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(6), pp. 505-526.

Reinders, H. (2018). Technology and autonomy. In J. I. Liontas, T. & M. DelliCarpini (Eds.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0433

Stark, P. and Freishtat, R. (2014). An evaluation of course evaluations. ScienceOpen. Retrieved from http://www.specs-csn.qc.ca/site-com/qlp/2015-2016/2016-03-30/articles.pdf

Smith Jaggars, S., Folk, A. L., & Mullins, D. (2018). Understanding students’ satisfaction with OERs as course materials. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 19(1). 66-74. doi: 10.1108/PMM-12-2017-0059

Watkins, J. and Wilkins, M. (2011). Using YouTube in the EFL classroom. Language Education in Asia, 2(1), 113-119.

Weerasinghe, I., Lalitha, S., & Fernando, R. (2017), Students’ satisfaction in higher education literature review. American Journal of Educational Research, 5 (5), 533-539.

Wei, Q., Siriyothin, P., & Lian, A.P. (2018). Chinese university EFL students’ perceptions of learner autonomy in language learning. Beyond Words, 6(1), 26-40.

Yusoff, M., Mcleay, F. & Woodruffe-Burton, H. (2015). Dimensions driving business student satisfaction in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 23(1), 86-104.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/asiantefl.v5i1.113

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
ASIAN TEFL: Journal of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics by http://www.asian-tefl.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://www.asian-tefl.com.
View My Stats
Indexed and Abstracted by:

          

ASIAN TEFL: Journal of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

web: www.asian-tefl.com

email: asian.teflj@gmail.com

Publisher: Asosiasi Dosen Linguistik, Pendidikan Bahasa, dan Sastra di Indonesia (Lecturer Association of Linguistics, Language Teaching, and Literature Studies in Indonesia)

Address: Prodi Sastra Inggris, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Jl Imam Bonjol No. 207, Semarang